The law was challenged in a lawsuit filed in late June by Backpage.com, a website that has become the nation's top forum for ads for thinly veiled references to prostitution since Craigslist shut its adult services section in 2010.
A New Jersey law aimed at combating the sexual trafficking of minors via the Internet hit another roadblock today when a federal judge ruled it conflicts with federal law and likely is unconstitutional as well.
U.S. District Judge Dennis Cavanaugh’s ruling puts on hold indefinitely the law signed by Gov. Chris Christie in May that penalizes anyone who knowingly publishes or disseminates any ad for a commercial sex act that includes the depiction of a minor.
The law was challenged in a lawsuit filed in late June by Backpage.com, a website that has become the nation’s top forum for ads for thinly veiled references to prostitution since Craigslist shut its adult services section in 2010. Cavanaugh issued a temporary restraining order shortly after the suit was filed.
During oral arguments today, he lauded the motives behind the law but said those didn’t outweigh the fact that it is pre-empted by federal legislation from the 1990s that gives websites and Internet providers a measure of immunity for content provided by third parties. He also said the law likely violates the First Amendment.
Cavanaugh said he was appalled by the specter of child exploitation “as any normal person would be.”
“But that’s not why we’re here,” he added. “It is not my job to write the laws; I have to interpret them.”
State Assemblywoman Valerie Vainieri-Huttle, who sponsored the bill in the state Legislature, said she would continue to seek to have the law validated on appeal.
“We felt New Jersey could be the leader in eradicating the sexual exploitation of children,” she said. “We need to continue so we can hold these people responsible for exploiting children.”
Dallas-based Backpage.com argued that New Jersey’s law is overly broad and would have a chilling effect on free speech. In court filings, the company has asserted that the law’s language could apply to any website that allows third parties to post content, be it user comments, reviews, chats or discussion forums. The lawsuit also notes that federal courts in Tennessee and Washington have issued permanent injunctions against similar laws in those states.
“No matter how compelling the state’s interest, they must pursue that interest with the least restrictive means, and this is not it,” James Grant, an attorney representing the company, told Cavanaugh on today.